To the Editor:
Re “President Plans to Ease Deadline on Car Emissions” (entrance web page, Feb. 18):
It’s not stunning that Large Auto, Large Oil, automotive sellers and others have teamed as much as run the Environmental Safety Company’s draft auto pollution rules off the street. What’s stunning and appalling is that after the hottest yr on document and pledges to boldly confront the local weather disaster, the Biden administration is bowing to their unseemly stress.
The draft referred to as for a fast ramp as much as requiring 67 p.c of recent vehicles, S.U.V.s and pickups to run on electrical energy by 2032. As a substitute, the administration will gradual the ramp up, delaying the change to scrub electrical vehicles. It will imply America’s new vehicles will use extra oil, spew extra air pollution, intensify international warming and sicken extra children with bronchial asthma.
Myopic automakers might revenue within the quick time period however pay in the long term when the world’s largest E.V. producer — China — seizes the market whereas American corporations produce extra of yesterday’s gasoline guzzlers.
U.S. automotive corporations by no means recovered the large market share they misplaced to Japanese corporations within the Seventies and ’80s. They don’t appear to have realized from their previous fiasco.
Daniel F. Becker
Washington
The author is the director of the Middle for Organic Range’s Protected Local weather Transport Marketing campaign.
To the Editor:
I’m not happy with this variation in coverage, however on the very least, President Biden had higher preserve and even enhance assist for E.V. purchases by the general public, corresponding to tax credits and growing the variety of charging stations.
If I purchase a brand new automotive will probably be an E.V., interval. I already drive a hybrid, however the time has come to go all the best way to E.V. And I hope different individuals available in the market for a brand new automobile will do the identical. The trade will reply, as a result of the demand for E.V.’s is there.
Brian Schill
San Antonio
Abortion Limits Underneath a Second Trump Administration
To the Editor:
Re “Trump Is Said to Favor Limit for Abortions” (entrance web page, Feb. 17), about reviews that Donald Trump helps a ban after 16 weeks with exceptions:
It must be no shock to anyone that Mr. Trump “has approached abortion transactionally,” and that he privately has stated he needs to keep away from committing himself on the problem till he has received the nomination.
He has approached each challenge in his life transactionally. Bob Woodward’s e book “Concern” about Mr. Trump reported that when he was considering operating for president the primary time, he went to a conservative political activist for recommendation.
The person informed Mr. Trump that it could be tough for him to run as a Republican for a number of causes, one in all which was that he had been an outspoken pro-choice supporter up to now. “That may be fastened,” Mr. Trump replied. The change was instantaneous, painless and completely unaccompanied by psychological anguish or soul-searching.
He in all probability offers extra thought to his reply when a waitress asks, “Would you want American cheese or cheddar in your burger, sir?”
David English
Acton, Mass.
To the Editor:
Re “Trump’s Allies Plan to Bolster Abortion Bans” (entrance web page, Feb. 18):
Studying in regards to the quite a few methods a second Trump administration might do materials hurt to abortion rights by way of government motion with none new legal guidelines, I used to be shocked by this callous sentence that was tossed off: “A 16-week ban would have an effect on solely a small fraction of abortions, given that just about 94 p.c occur within the first trimester, earlier than 13 weeks of being pregnant.”
Such a ban would have an effect on 100% of pregnancies by which deadly diagnoses for the fetus are made at the usual 20-week ultrasound, dooming these ladies to danger their well being persevering with pregnancies solely to ship infants they’d then watch die.
The information is filled with such tales from purple states with post-Roe abortion bans that fake to have medical exceptions. Abortion is finest left to sufferers, their households and their docs. The selection on this election couldn’t be extra clear.
Andrew Ross
Denver
The author is an obstetrician-gynecologist.
Preserving Navalny’s Work Alive
To the Editor:
“Navalny’s Widow Accepts Mantle of the Opposition” (entrance web page, Feb. 20) introduced tears to my eyes. Preserving alive the reminiscence and work of this brave man who gave his life combating tyranny in Russia on behalf of the unjustly oppressed will assist rally others to affix the trigger.
I suggest the institution of an Aleksei Navalny Prize to be awarded to a worthy particular person who meets his normal of braveness and moral precept within the battle for freedom in opposition to tyranny. A few of the funds can be utilized to assist Mr. Navalny’s spouse, Yulia Navalnaya, and different Russian freedom fighters advance this trigger.
Kenneth Rosenbaum
New York
$399 Trump Sneakers
To the Editor:
Re “Reeling From $450 Million Penalty, Trump Hawks $400 Shoes” (nytimes.com, Feb. 18), about Donald Trump’s promotion of Trump-branded sneakers:
Anyone who buys a pair of $399 gold sneakers goes to should ask themselves whether or not their private economic system isn’t doing just a bit bit higher than they (and Mr. Trump) have been saying it’s. And in the event that they don’t, we owe it to ourselves to recommend it for them.
Claudia Lynch
New Orleans
