Jamie Golombek: Taxpayers who inadvertently overcontribute to their TFSA face a hefty penalty tax
Critiques and proposals are unbiased and merchandise are independently chosen. Postmedia might earn an affiliate fee from purchases made by hyperlinks on this web page.
Article content material
Canadians will quickly have the ability to contribute one other $7,000 to their tax-free savings accounts for 2024. For somebody who has by no means contributed to a TFSA, and has been a resident of Canada and at the very least 18 years of age since 2009, the cumulative TFSA restrict will hit $95,000.
Your private TFSA contribution restrict in any given yr, nonetheless, will differ primarily based on each prior years’ contributions in addition to any withdrawals. That’s as a result of the total quantity withdrawn (each your contributions and any tax-free earnings or progress) is added again to your contribution room at the beginning of the calendar yr following the withdrawal.
Commercial 2
Article content material
Article content material
It’s vital to remain on prime of your TFSA contribution restrict lest you inadvertently overcontribute and face the overcontribution penalty tax equal to 1 per cent monthly for every month you’re over your restrict. A one per cent tax doesn’t look like so much, however understand that the tax is one per cent monthly for every month you’re over the restrict till the overcontribution is withdrawn.
For instance, in the event you by accident overcontribute in January 2024 and don’t uncover your error till January 2025, your penalty tax for 2024 could be 12 per cent of your overcontribution. Provided that the penalty tax is paid with after-tax {dollars}, in the event you’re within the prime tax bracket of round 50 per cent, you’d want a 24 per cent price of return in your TFSA overcontribution funding simply to equal the penalty tax.
Consequently, it’s finest to not get into an overcontribution scenario, so you actually ought to be monitoring your personal TFSA restrict. That is much more vital for taxpayers who’ve a number of TFSAs, those that don’t maximize their contributions annually and, particularly, those that repeatedly (and even often) withdraw funds from their TFSA.
Article content material
Commercial 3
Article content material
Happily, you possibly can verify your TFSA contribution on-line by logging on to the Canada Revenue Agency’s on-line portal for people known as My Account. However consider your TFSA contribution and withdrawal data will not be up to date in actual time and could also be outdated. Verify the “as of” date posted on-line alongside along with your TFSA room.
When you do get assessed with a TFSA overcontribution tax, you possibly can at all times ask the CRA to waive or cancel it, which the company has the ability to do if it may be established the tax arose “as a consequence of an inexpensive error” and the overcontribution is withdrawn from the TFSA “immediately.” If the CRA refuses to cancel the tax, you possibly can take the matter to federal courtroom, the place a choose will decide whether or not the company’s determination to not waive the tax was cheap.
A tax case determined final week concerned somebody who by accident overcontributed to his TFSA and, because of this, was assessed the penalty tax and curiosity. The taxpayer had obtained a discover from the CRA indicating his TFSA contribution room as of Jan. 1, 2020, was “($5,000), the brackets indicating he was over the restrict by that a lot, however he understood this to imply he may contribute one other $5,000 to his TFSA. Because the contribution room for 2020 had elevated to $6,000, he contributed that quantity, thus inadvertently rising his contributions to “($11,000),” or $11,000 over the restrict.
Commercial 4
Article content material
He instantly eliminated the surplus contributions when he obtained the CRA’s 2020 discover of evaluation of the TFSA overcontribution penalty tax and curiosity, and knowledgeable the CRA of such. He then requested the penalty tax and curiosity be waived arguing that “not having an accounting background,” he had misunderstood the usage of the brackets. He argued this was an trustworthy mistake.
The CRA declined to take action, indicating the taxpayer had beforehand been notified about making extra contributions, so this was not the primary time he had overcontributed. The taxpayer denied having ever been notified by the CRA a few prior extra TFSA contribution, though he did admit {that a} “TFSA Education letter” had been posted to his CRA account on Could 17, 2019. He testified he had not learn it as a result of, in his view, “it was basic data not particularly directed at him.”
The taxpayer determined to attraction his TFSA evaluation in courtroom, arguing the CRA’s refusal to cancel the penalty tax and curiosity was unfair. Sadly, he selected the incorrect courtroom, mistakenly interesting to the Tax Courtroom of Canada.
Commercial 5
Article content material
It appears logical that in the event you needed to dispute a tax assessed beneath the Revenue Tax Act, you’d attraction to the Tax Courtroom, however this can be a frequent mistake, particularly by taxpayers who determine to characterize themselves in courtroom and should not accustomed to the authorized course of.
The part of the Revenue Tax Act that offers the CRA the flexibility to forgive the overcontribution penalty tax is a part of the “Taxpayer reduction provisions.” A 2014 Federal Courtroom of Attraction determination confirmed that “the Tax Courtroom doesn’t have the jurisdiction to find out whether or not the (CRA) correctly exercised (its) discretion … when deciding whether or not or to not waive or cancel a penalty.” Moderately, this will solely be challenged “by means of an utility for judicial evaluate within the Federal Courtroom.”
This was reconfirmed in a 2019 determination, which acknowledged the “case regulation is evident: if a taxpayer needs a evaluate of the (CRA’s) determination regarding curiosity reduction he should file an utility for judicial evaluate on the Federal Courtroom … (the Tax Courtroom) can’t grant the reduction that the (taxpayers) are searching for.”
Associated Tales
Commercial 6
Article content material
The choose within the present case famous these two selections have been “enough to get rid of the attraction,” however he nonetheless reviewed the taxpayer’s arguments and concluded his attraction couldn’t be allowed. “Ultimately, the (taxpayer) had an obligation to make sure that his contributions have been inside the annual contribution restrict,” he mentioned in his ruling. “Had he taken the time to trace these quantities, he may have averted the surplus contributions and thus the penalties.”
As we enter a brand new tax yr, my finest TFSA recommendation continues to be: Know your restrict and keep inside it.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.
When you preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
Article content material